lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1157371363.30801.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:02:43 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: PATA drivers queued for 2.6.19

Ar Llu, 2006-09-04 am 07:01 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jeff Garzik:
> The following must be in all caps, though:
> 
> drivers/ide IS STILL THE PATA DRIVER SET THAT USERS AND DISTROS SHOULD 
> CHOOSE.

Except optionally for the following for chips not handled by or broken
totally in drivers/ide:

	pata_mpiix - some early pentium era laptops
	pata_oldpiix - original "PIIX" chipset
	pata_radisys - embedded chipset

The other apparently "libata only" chips are pata_jmicron and
pata_optidma. There are patches to handle these as "generic" PCI IDE in
the base 2.6.18 tree already so only features will be lost (eg mode
switching). As Jeff implies distributions should be using drivers/ide
for the Jmicron PATA and the Opti DMA PATA for now.

> * /dev/sdX supports fewer partitions than /dev/hdX (16 versus 64, IIRC)
> 
> * /dev/sdX does not support all the HDIO_xxx ioctls that /dev/hdX does. 
>   In practice, the ioctls we ignored are ones that very few people care 
> about.

Add "/dev/sr*" does not support partitions. (That needs fixing anyway)
    
> * ARM, PPC and other non-x86 platform drivers are severely 
> under-represented.

libata needs changes for this too. I have some stuff saved from the
older discussions to look at.

> As an aside, I would love to see paride updated to use libata, but we 
> can probably count the number of paride users on one hand these days...

and thats without using fingers or thumbs.


-- 
VGER BF report: H 0.235691
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ