| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:21:08 +0200 From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@...tempel.de> To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>, Marc Perkel <marc@...kel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Raid 0 Swap? Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> wrote: > Marc Perkel wrote: >> If I have two drives and I want swap to be fast if I allocate swap spam >> on both drives does it break up the load between them? Or would it run >> faster if I did a Raid 0 swap? Swap has priorities, and it will do something like striping if two swap spaces have the same priority. [...] > Ie, your swap space must be reliable. At least not worse than your memory. It's mostly enough if it's as reliable as the system disk. > And with striping, you've much more chances of disk failure... It won't increase because of using striping, but because of the amount of disks used. -- Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren. http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists