[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060904215647.GA1975@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:56:47 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@...oo.fr>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re : [HELP] Power management for embedded system
Hi!
> > It would be nice to move that to some arch independent generic
> > implementation of these things and to leave the APM emulation behind.
> > The battery information should be a sysfs class (see the backlight/led
> > classes as examples of sysfs classes). The suspend/resume event handling
> > would be something new as far as I know and ideally should support
> > suspending/resuming individual sections of device hardware as well as
> > the whole system.
>
> Triggering suspend/resume is already generic in the form of the
> /sys/power/state interface. There's been discussion of producing a
> generic battery class lately. There's some trend towards tying suspend
> requests into the input layer, but how appropriate that is may
> > depend on
suspend requests into input layer.. No, I do not think Dmitry will
allow us to do that.
Yes, we definitely want some kind of "generic battery" layer.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists