[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e0cf0bf0609040142y795f9252sd7a8ca1ce8fdde75@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:42:30 +0300
From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@...il.com>
To: schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Cc: "Nigel Cunningham" <ncunningham@...uxmail.org>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johninsd@....rr.com, davej@...emonkey.org.uk, Riley@...liams.name,
trini@...nel.crashing.org, davem@...emloft.net, ecd@...inaid.de,
jj@...site.ms.mff.cuni.cz, anton@...ba.org, wli@...omorphy.com,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, rc@....org.uk, spyro@....com, rth@...ddle.net,
avr32@...el.com, hskinnemoen@...el.com, starvik@...s.com,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, matthew@....cx, grundler@...isc-linux.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, zippel@...ux-m68k.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, uclinux-v850@....nec.co.jp,
chris@...kel.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
On 9/4/06, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> The reason is our initial address space layout for the very first kernel
> images. Now it is hard to changed because the different ipl tools rely
> on the layout. We choose to add a few more bytes than 256 because on
> s390 we potentially have many devices. The dasd= parameter can really be
> big.
Thanks for the explanation... I've been curios as well :)
Can you please check if this patch is OK in s390 environment?
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
--
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists