[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CB81ECDC-0B48-4BE4-B9C0-C1CDBEC0F739@vhugo.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:55:53 -0700
From: Victor Hugo <victor@...go.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Victor Castro <victorhugo83@...oo.com>
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] request_firmware examples and MODULE_FIRMWARE
Hi Everyone,
I'm trying to become the firmware loader maintainer
(request_firmware) and I felt the first thing I should do is update
the incomplete example driver under Documentaion/firmware_class/.
The example (firmware_sample_driver.c) doesn't work out of box and
needs tweaking just to get it to compile. I've added two files which
use request_firmware and the asynchronous request_firmware_nowait.
The next step would be to update the documentation to make hotplug/
udev functionality a little more clear. Hopefully I can get this in
the next couple of days.
Also, I'd like to comment on Jon Masters push to include the
MODULE_FIRMWARE api addition. I strongly believe that policy should
not be included in driver code, in this case it's in the form of a
filename.
The firmware loader currently needs a filename passed to it so it can
then pass the $FIRMWARE environment variable to the hotplug script.
This is ok if you provide a generic filename like "firmware.bin" and
then let the hotplug script worry about version numbers, i.e.
"firmware-x.y.z.bin"
MODULE_FIRMWARE should be used to provide the generic filenames and
which order the files should be loaded (request_firmware can be
called various times), but I think its bad to have to change the
driver everytime a new firmware version is released.
That said, here's the patch...
Download attachment "firmware_examples.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (7494 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists