[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4987.1157452656@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:37:36 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, torvalds@...l.org,
steved@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
> > As long as you don't rely on stat...mkdir working. That can go wrong if the
> > dentry gets booted from the dcache by memory pressure in the "...".
>
> I'm not clear on your point here.
I was wondering if you were going to rely on stat() forcing the dentry to be
correctly initialised before you did mkdir(), but it seems not.
> If I stat a path and it exists then all is good and I'm done.
> If I stat a path and I get something other than ENOENT then all is bad
> and I return fail.
> Otherwise I can just attempt to create the directory and fail if all is
> bad with that.
Okay, I suppose. But that still doesn't seem to deal with the case of creating
a directory on the client that then overlays a symlink on the server that you
can't yet access.
You may also get ENOENT because you stat a symlink, though you'll get EEXIST
from mkdir, even if there's nothing at the far end.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists