[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060905112239.GA11064@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:22:39 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@...hat.com>,
David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] GFS2: Directory handling
* Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> >Secondly, whenever we have curly braces in the first block, we tend to
> >do it in the second block too, for easier parsing. I.e.:
> >
> > if ((char *)cur + cur_rec_len > bh_end) {
> > gfs2_consist_inode(dip);
> > return -EIO;
> > } else {
> > if ((char *)cur + cur_rec_len == bh_end)
> > return -ENOENT;
> > }
>
> I would very much like to do just this
>
> many insns;
> } else if(...) {
> single insn;
> }
yeah, almost - what we want is:
many insns;
} else if (...) {
single insn;
}
;-)
> but again, some people think no {} should be there because it's just a
> single insn. [...]
i used to be such a person but got converted: it makes visual sense to
have symmetry of curly braces. So it's fine to have:
if (...)
single insn;
else
single insn;
but otherwise, if any of the blocks grows larger than 1 line, it should
be curly braces all around.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists