[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060906001010.GN9173@stusta.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:10:10 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:27:08AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:23 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> >> This information confuses me. These places are not supposed to be the
> >> ones where the locks were actually acquired, are they?
> >
> > they should be yes
> > (but inlined functions get the name of the function they are inlined
> > into)
>
> Was there function inlining performed? E.g. on those functions that are
> called from only one place?
If a static function has only one caller it gets inlined.
> Stefan Richter
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists