[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44FEF90E.1050407@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:36:30 -0700
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To: suparna@...ibm.com
CC: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io_worker()
> code more maintainable (I hope/wish we could also do something similar with
> simplifying the locking as well).
I agree, and that is definitely on my medium-term todo list.
> Of course with this code, we have to await rigorous testing
> ... and more reviews, but please consider this as my ack for the approach.
Yeah, absolutely. Is there a chance that IBM can throw some testing
cycles at it? I have it queued up for some moderately sized DB runs
over here (FC arrays, cable pulling, that kind of thing.)
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists