[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060906200155.GL7139@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:01:55 -0500
From: linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-pci maillist <linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Yanmin Zhang <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@...el.com>
Subject: Re: pci error recovery procedure
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:26:56AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > The
> > > error_detected of the drivers in the latest kernel who support err handlers
> > > always returns PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET. They are typical examples.
> >
> > Just because the current drivers do it this way does not mean that this is
> > the best way to do things.
>
> If it's not the best way, why did you choose to reset slot for e1000/e100/ipr
> error handlers? They are typical widely-used devices. To make it easier to
> add error handlers?
I did it that way just to get going, get something working. I do not
have hardware specs for any of these devices, and do not have much of
an idea of what they are capable of; the recovery code I wrote is of
"brute force, hit it with a hammer"-nature. Driver writers who
know thier hardware well, and are interested in a more refined
approach are encouraged to actualy use a more refined approach.
--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists