linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1pse8vjjg.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:15:15 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fastboot@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec

Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> writes:

> On Wednesday 06 September 2006 18:55, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> kexec has been marked experimental for a year now and all
>> of the serious problems have been worked through.  So it
>> is time (if not past time) to remove the experimental mark.
>> 
>
> Hmm, I personally have some doubts it is really not experimental
> (not because of the kexec code itself, but because of all the other drivers
> that still break)

That is a reasonable viewpoint.  Although by that a lot more of the kernel
deserves to be marked experimental. 

On the perverse side of the sentiment taking off experimental may increase
our number of testers and get the bugs fixed faster :)

> But applied for now.

Thanks.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/