[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609060936.19268.ak@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:36:19 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Kimball Murray <kimball.murray@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...eo.com
Subject: Re: [Feature] x86_64 page tracking for Stratus servers
> Silly question, why can't you do all this from stop_machine_run context (or
> your SMI) that doesn't have to worry about other CPUs dirtying memory?
Because that would be too slow for continuous mirroring.
You can't go through 10+GB of virtual memory (or more with shared
memory because the scan has to be virtual) in an interrupt.
The only sane way is to do it continuously.
> [*] Though if it gets included, it would not stop me lamenting the
> proliferation of complexities to support *tiny* obscure userbases. Can
> we wait until your hardware is smart enough to snoop the cc? :)
My guess is that if we had a generic memory mirror subsystem other people would
find uses for it too. e.g. a lot of systems support spare DIMMs these days and mirroring
some memory to it seems like a smart idea. That means normally the hardware
does it, but perhaps some stuff can be done better by doing it in software.
Or it is also a bit similar to the algorithms Xen uses for live migration.
If that was implemented on the kernel level something like this might
be useful too. I think OpenVZ has some kind of migration support, but it's
currently not live.
-andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists