[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060907000441.GA22240@clipper.ens.fr>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:04:41 +0200
From: David Madore <david.madore@....fr>
To: Linux Kernel mailing-list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: patch to make Linux capabilities into something useful (v 0.3.1)
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:27:31AM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 01:25:31PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > I'd recommend you split this patch into at least 3:
> > 1. move to 64-bit caps
> > 2. introduce your new caps
> > (perhaps even one new cap per patch)
> > 3. introduce the new inheritance rules
>
> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. I'll do that.
Done. Attached. Except that the order is
part1: move to 64-bit caps (and also re-enable CAP_SETPCAP),
where upper 32-bits are "regular" capabilities (but none defined)
part2: introduce the new inheritance rules
part3: introduce new ("regular") capabilities
Cheers,
--
David A. Madore
(david.madore@....fr,
http://www.madore.org/~david/ )
View attachment "caps-0.3.1-split-part1-setsize-linux-2.6.18-rc6.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (8227 bytes)
View attachment "caps-0.3.1-split-part2-semantics-linux-2.6.18-rc6.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (7028 bytes)
View attachment "caps-0.3.1-split-part3-newcaps-linux-2.6.18-rc6.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2984 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists