[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609070857310.31500@turbotaz.ourhouse>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:01:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>
To: Stuart MacDonald <stuartm@...necttech.com>
cc: 'Chase Venters' <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
'Krzysztof Halasa' <khc@...waw.pl>, ellis@...nics.net,
'Willy Tarreau' <w@....eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [OT] RE: bogofilter ate 3/5
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> From: On Behalf Of Chase Venters
>> You can check the From: or envelope sender against the subscriber
>> database. Forgery isn't a concern because we're not trying to stop
>> forgery with this method. Subscribers subscribing one address
>
> Forgery is always a concern...
>
>> The perl script behaves as an optional autoresponder.
>> Autoresponders would
>> respond to spam as well (well, unless you put a spam filter
>> in front of
>> them, but I assume that many don't).
>
> ..because autoresponders are always replying to forged addresses:
> http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html
>
>> Also note that a number of people (myself included, at work
>> anyway) have
>> perl scripts that respond to all incoming mail and require a
>> reply cookie from original
>> envelope senders. We do it because it almost entirely
>> prevents spam from
>> arriving in our inboxes (I say almost because there is the occasional
>
> Autoresponder by another name, see above URL.
Fortunately, the bulk of bulk mail I receive these days is forged but not
forged from legitimate users. To give you an example from my daily log
(which is e-mailed to me so I can keep an eye on the insanity):
2006-09-06T06:25:11 -- Challenged 'Beliefnet Daily Inspiration
<BeliefnetDailyInspiration@...tner.beliefnet.com>'
2006-09-06T06:40:23 -- Challenged '"newsletters@...mmers.com"
<newsletters@...mmers.com>'
2006-09-06T09:56:13 -- Challenged '"LexingtonLawBringsYou"
<LexingtonLawBringsYou@...dchristmastree.net>'
2006-09-06T12:25:34 -- Challenged '"OFFER CONFIRMATION."
<slt@...tective-vehicle.com>'
2006-09-06T12:30:39 -- Challenged '"Rate Alert!"
<LocalRate@...uiredinstallation.com>'
2006-09-06T12:57:54 -- Challenged '"Rate Alert!"
<LocalRate@...derful-scholar.com>'
2006-09-06T12:57:56 -- Challenged '"OFFER CONFIRMATION."
<slt@...ated-polymer.com>'
2006-09-06T13:08:02 -- Challenged '"PlatinumRewardsClubEmailOffers"
<PlatinumRewardsClubEmailOffers@...itarygroup.com>'
2006-09-06T13:34:18 -- Challenged '"CellPhoneGiveawaysNetDeals"
<CellPhoneGiveawaysNetDeals@...lbillymaryann.com>'
2006-09-06T13:39:23 -- Challenged '"Barber" <lpb@...eredrevenue.com>'
2006-09-06T13:59:36 -- Challenged '"Barber" <lpb@...eredrevenue.com>'
2006-09-06T14:08:44 -- Challenged '"LifeScript Healthy Advantage"
<LifeScriptHealthyAdvantage@...escript.com>'
2006-09-06T14:27:00 -- Challenged 'FS Report <freeinkplus@...ly.mb00.net>'
2006-09-06T14:46:12 -- Challenged '"OFFER_C0NFIRMATI0N!"
<ndc@...ferentirradiation.com>'
2006-09-06T15:07:26 -- Challenged '"Maureen&Team" <maureen@...jwire.com>'
2006-09-06T15:07:27 -- Delivered message from 'Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
<jaervosz@...too.org>' (whitelist)
2006-09-06T15:09:30 -- Challenged '"BHG.com
Kitchen"<Recipe@...il.bhg.com>'
2006-09-06T15:11:40 -- Challenged '"1 2 3 I n k Jets"
<ikj@...sequent-grievance.com>'
If these challenges bounce (_many_ of them do), the box and host end up on
the blacklist.
> ..Stu
>
>
Thanks,
Chase
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists