[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45003985.7060304@sw.ru>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:23:49 +0400
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrey Mirkin <amirkin@...ru>, devel@...nvz.org,
mikpe@...uu.se, sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fail kernel compilation in case of unresolved symbols
(v2)
Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>
>>If any module shipped with the kernel has in any configuration
>>unresolved symbols that's a bug that should be reported, not ignored.
>
>
> Yes, but on request when building the package. Not per default.
> I probably missed the reason why this is now suddenly a problem.
It is not that sudden at all. I experienced this problem many times so far
and working with a build system came to the idea of failing
builds when there are unresolved symbols.
I'm pretty sure that having this patch in mainstream
will make unresolved symbols a rare problem as many of them will be fixed soon.
So I'm pretty agree with Adrian that modules with unresolved symbols is a bug
and it MUST be fixed.
I would be very much interested to hear Andrew opinion on this as
he probably makes kernels even more often than any of us :)
Thanks,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists