[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060907101512.3e3a9604.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:15:12 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table
driven.
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:23:00 -0600
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
> This patch generalizes the concept of files in /proc that are
> related to processes but live in the root directory of /proc
>
> Ideally this would reuse infrastructure from the rest of the
> process specific parts of proc but unfortunately
> security_task_to_inode must not be called on files that
> are not strictly per process. security_task_to_inode
> really needs to be reexamined as the security label can
> change in important places that we are not currently
> catching, but I'm not certain that simplifies this problem.
>
> By at least matching the structure of the rest of proc
> we get more idiom reuse and it becomes easier to spot problems
> in the way things are put together.
>
> Later things like /proc/mounts are likely to be moved into
> proc_base as well. If union mounts are ever supported
> we may be able to make /proc a union mount, and properly
> split it into 2 filesystems.
>
> ..
>
> /*
> + * proc base
> + *
> + * These are the directory entries in the root directory of /proc
> + * that properly belong to the /proc filesystem, as they describe
> + * describe something that is process related.
> + */
> +static struct pid_entry proc_base_stuff[] = {
> + NOD(PROC_TGID_INO, "self", S_IFLNK|S_IRWXUGO,
> + &proc_self_inode_operations, NULL, {}),
> + {}
> +};
We could save a bunch of bytes here.
> + /* Lookup the directory entry */
> + for (p = proc_base_stuff; p->name; p++) {
By using ARRAY_SIZE here.
> + for (; nr < (ARRAY_SIZE(proc_base_stuff) - 1); filp->f_pos++, nr++) {
like that does.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists