| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:35:31 -0400 From: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@...necttech.com> To: "'Chase Venters'" <chase.venters@...entec.com> Cc: "'Krzysztof Halasa'" <khc@...waw.pl>, <ellis@...nics.net>, "'Willy Tarreau'" <w@....eu>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: bogofilter ate 3/5 From: Chase Venters [mailto:chase.venters@...entec.com] > highly ironic that spam blocker services tell you not to use certain > techniques (autoresponders, bounce messages) that are not only > commonplace, but precedented and even mandated by RFC on the > grounds that > they may cause you to be blocked. Then they move on to > criticize anti-spam > techniques that fall in these domains with one of their > subpoints saying > 'they can cause you to miss legitimate mail!' > > Guess what: so does indiscriminately blocking people whose > sites don't bow > down to your unreasonable demands, especially when their > behavior (say, > sending bounce messages) is described in the official protocol > documentation. I will assume you are referring to SpamCop. Their service does not behave the way you think it does: http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?autocom=custom&page=whatis Read the paragraph: "SpamCop works exactly like the credit reporting agencies..." ..Stu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists