[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08ec01c6d2c1$67e43d10$294b82ce@stuartm>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:05:53 -0400
From: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@...necttech.com>
To: "'Chase Venters'" <chase.venters@...entec.com>
Cc: "'Krzysztof Halasa'" <khc@...waw.pl>, <ellis@...nics.net>,
"'Willy Tarreau'" <w@....eu>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: bogofilter ate 3/5
From: Chase Venters [mailto:chase.venters@...entec.com]
> What are you implying - that SpamCop doesn't make decisions
> about who to
> block and who to not block for third parties? Their weasel wording
It's not an implication, it's a fact.
> I will strongly criticize any service that purports to label
> senders of
> automatic responses as senders of unsolicited mail. The
What would you call it then when I receive a bounce/etc that is in
reponse to a message someone else sent? I certainly never solicited
that.
Perhaps you could send me your snail mail address; I'll solicit some
junk mail but put your address down. But don't call it junk mail when
you receive it, because it was solicited!
> And on the specific issue of autoresponders, I think a reasonable
> compromise is to support DomainKeys. That way if a sender is
> irritated
> that they are receiving automatic responses from messages they didn't
> send, they can personally take action to invalidate the forgery.
IMO one should never have to receive "automatic responses from
messages they didn't send".
> But mark my words: Asking hosts to stop sending bounce messages or
> automatic responses is insane and contrary to over a decade
> of established
> postmaster precedent.
Things change.
..Stu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists