linux-kernel - Re: NPTL mutex and the scheduling priority

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060907.184235.15248417.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Date:	Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:42:35 +0900 (JST)
From:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To:	schwab@...e.de
Cc:	jakub@...hat.com, sebastien.dugue@...l.net, arjan@...radead.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	pierre.peiffer@...l.net, drepper@...hat.com
Subject: Re: NPTL mutex and the scheduling priority

On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:37:54 +0200, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de> wrote:
> > And ENOTSUP is not enumerated in ERRORS section of pthread_mutex_init.
> 
> POSIX does not forbid additional error conditions, as long as the
> described conditions are properly reported with the documented error
> numbers.

Oh, I see the point.  Thank you.

---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/