linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609081507330.20566@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:08:48 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table
 driven.

>>>> +	for (; nr < (ARRAY_SIZE(proc_base_stuff) - 1); filp->f_pos++, nr++) {
>>>
>> Also works without the () around ARRAY_SIZE(..)-1
>
>Sure.  But I don't really trust C precedence (because it is wrong)

Wrong? In mathematics, "a < (b - 1)" also is equivalent to "a < b - 1".

>and having to remember where it is wrong sucks.  Plus in this
>case I really am making it clear that ARRAY_SIZE(..)-1 is the concept
>I want.   If there would any more to the expression that would
>be important.

Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/