[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609081546260.25316@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:47:03 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
cc: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: re-reading the partition table on a "busy" drive
>> My anwser to this question: if it's so "pretty annoying", just let it be
>> "yes, do as i said !", not more and not less, just most ;).
>
>Well, this whole question is already moot, as pointed out by Olaf.
>Because kernel already supports add/delete single partition ioctls,
>which is sufficient. For my needs I already wrote a tiny hack which
>compares /proc/partitions with the output of `sfdisk -d' and re-adds
>anything which changed. It should be possible to do the same with
>parted instead of {sf,cf,f}disk without using that hack, but hell,
>all those fdisks (parted included) sucks badly, each in its own way,
>so all are being used for different parts of the task, including the
>hack ;)
So something should write the perfect utility. There are people on this
list capable of this, like we have seen with git :)
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists