lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060908103529.A9121@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Sep 2006 10:35:29 -0700
From:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
	mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 04:38:33PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> +int cpu_of(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	return rq->cpu;
> +#else
> +	return 0;
> +#endif
> +}

Is there a reason why this is not made inline?

>  static struct sched_group *
>  find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
> -		   unsigned long *imbalance, enum idle_type idle, int
> *sd_idle)
> +		   unsigned long *imbalance, enum idle_type idle, int
> *sd_idle,
> +		   cpumask_t *cpus)
>  {
>  	struct sched_group *busiest = NULL, *this = NULL, *group =
> sd->groups;
>  	unsigned long max_load, avg_load, total_load, this_load,
> total_pwr;
> @@ -2243,7 +2254,12 @@
>  		sum_weighted_load = sum_nr_running = avg_load = 0;
>  
>  		for_each_cpu_mask(i, group->cpumask) {
> -			struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
> +			struct rq *rq;
> +
> +			if (!cpu_isset(i, *cpus))
> +				continue;

In normal conditions can we make this "cpus" argument NULL and only set/use it
when we run into pinned condition? That will atleast avoid unnecessary memory
test bit operations in the normal case.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ