linux-kernel - Re: TG3 data corruption (TSO ?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1157745256.5344.8.camel@rh4>
Date:	Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:54:16 -0700
From:	"Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
To:	"Segher Boessenkool" <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
cc:	"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TG3 data corruption (TSO ?)

On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 21:29 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:

> I've got a patch that seems so solve the problem, it needs more testing
> though (maybe Ben can do this :-) ).  The problem is that there should
> be quite a few wmb()'s in the code that are just not there; adding some
> to tg3_set_txd() seems to fix the immediate problem but more is needed
> (and I don't see why those should be needed, unless tg3_set_txd() is
> updating a life ring entry in place or something like that).
> 
> More testing is needed, but the problem is definitely the lack of memory
> ordering.
> 
Oh, we know about this.  The powerpc writel() used to have memory
barriers in 2.4 kernels but not any more in 2.6 kernels.  Red Hat's
version of tg3 has extra wmb()'s to fix this problem.  David doesn't
think that the upstream version of tg3 should have these wmb()'s, and
the problem should instead be fixed in powerpc's writel().

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/