[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4132.24.9.204.52.1157682479.squirrel@mail.cce.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:27:59 -0600 (MDT)
From: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: "Shaohua Li" <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bjorn.helgaas@...com>, kmannth@...ibm.com,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Mattia Dongili" <malattia@...ux.it>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
"lkml" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux acpi" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: one more ACPI Error (utglobal-0125): Unknown exception
code:0xFFFFFFEA [Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm3]
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:25 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> If we decide that "try HID first, then try CID" is the right thing,
>> I think we should figure out how to make that work. Maybe that
>> means extending the driver model somehow.
> Don't think it's easy, especially no other bus needs it I guess.
I agree it's probably not easy, but I think having the right
semantics is more important than fitting cleanly into the
driver model. But I know that without code, I'm just venting
hot air, not contributing to a solution.
How's the ACPI driver model integration going, anyway? I seem
to recall some patches a while back, but I don't think they're
in the tree yet.
> Do we really need the memory hotplug device returns pnp0c01/pnp0c02?
> What's the purpose?
I don't know. But I think Keith already determined that a BIOS change
is not likely. I hate to ask for BIOS changes like this because it
feels like asking them to avoid broken things in Linux.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists