linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] linux/magic.h for magic numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4502C086.2080302@garzik.org>
Date:	Sat, 09 Sep 2006 09:24:22 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@...com.net>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/magic.h for magic numbers

Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> An IRC discussion sparked a memory:  most filesystems really don't
>> need to put anything at all in include/linux.  Excluding API-ish
>> filesystems like procfs, just about the only filesystem symbols that
>> get exported outside of __KERNEL__ are the *_SUPER_MAGIC symbols,
>> and similar symbols.
>>
>> After seeing the useful attributes of linux/poison.h, I propose a
>> similar linux/magic.h.
> 
> But... if some patch changes this file (like adding new magic symbol) it 
> will cause large part of the kernel to rebuild without any good reason. No?

No :)

* The days when linux/fs.h included individual filesystem headers is 
long gone.  Only the filesystems themselves typically include the 
linux/foo_fs*.h files these days.

* It's not like we add new filesystems to the kernel very often.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/