lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:40:46 -0400 From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com> To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>, akpm@...l.org, torvalds@...l.org, sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org, jeff@...zik.org, cw@...f.org, bjorn.helgaas@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, harmon@....edu, len.brown@...el.com, vsu@...linux.ru, liste@...det.net Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 17:21 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:31:12AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > VIA have always told me that "ACPI handles this" and we don't need > > quirks. Various chips have different IRQ routing logic and it's all a > > bit weird if we don't use ACPI and/or BIOS routing. > > So why isn't acpi handling all of this for us? Do people not want to > use acpi for some reason? Some applications such as realtime audio and probably gaming require ACPI to be disabled, as it causes horrible latency problems. This applies equally to Linux and Windows. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists