linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -rc6] [resend] Documentation/ABI: devfs is not obsolete, but removed!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4503C807.5040403@tls.msk.ru>
Date:	Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:08:39 +0400
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	"jens m. noedler" <noedler@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rc6] [resend] Documentation/ABI: devfs is not obsolete,
 but removed!

Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:04:53PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> jens m. noedler wrote:
>>> Hi everybody, Greg, Linus,
>>>
>>> This little patch just moves the devfs entry from ABI/obsolete to
>>> ABI/removed and adds the comment, that devfs was removed in 2.6.18.
>>>
>> []
>>> +	The files fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h will be removed,
>>> +	along with the the assorted devfs function calls throughout the
>>> +	kernel tree.
>> So, will the files be removed at some point, or has them been removed
>> already? :)
> 
> They are already removed.

I know they're gone. I was just pointing out that the patch is wrong,
as it claims the files *will* be removed.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/