linux-kernel - Re: Vendor field with USB, [SP]ATA etc-attached disks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:34:03 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
CC:	Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Vendor field with USB, [SP]ATA etc-attached disks

Michael Tokarev wrote:
> With current SATA, PATA and at least some USB disks,
> Linux reports Vendor: $subsystem, instead of the actual
> vendor of the drive, like this:
> 
> scsi1 : ata_piix
>   Vendor: ATA       Model: ST3808110AS       Rev: n/a
>   Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 05
> 
> This should be Vendor: Seagate, not ATA (Note also the lack
> of "Revision" field).  The same for PATA disk:
> 
> scsi0 : pata_via
>   Vendor: ATA       Model: ST3120026A        Rev: 3.76
>   Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 05
> 
> The same is shown in /sys/block/$DEV/device/vendor.
> 
> Can it be changed to show real vendor, instead of the subsystem name?

No.  Two reasons:

* ATA doesn't export the vendor separate from the model, and in some 
cases (Seagate) it isn't present at all, anywhere.
* "ATA" vendor string is the standardized value to put in that field, 
according to the SCSI T10 specifications.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/