lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:18:07 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	neilb@...e.de, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	christopher.leech@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/19] raid5: move the reconstruct write expansion operation to a workqueue

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

Enable handle_stripe5 to use the reconstruct write operations capability
for expansion operations.  

However this does not move the copy operation associated with an expand to
the workqueue.  First, it was difficult to find a clean way to pass the
parameters of this operation to the queue.  Second, this section of code is
a good candidate for performing the copies with inline calls to the dma
routines.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
---

 drivers/md/raid5.c |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 1a8dfd2..a07b52b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2053,6 +2053,7 @@ #endif
 	 * completed
 	 */
 	if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW, &sh->state) &&
+		!test_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW_Expand, &sh->ops.state) &&
 		test_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW_Done, &sh->ops.state)) {
 		clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW, &sh->state);
 		clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW_Done, &sh->ops.state);
@@ -2226,6 +2227,7 @@ #endif
 				}
 			}
 		}
+
 		if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_Done, &sh->ops.state) &&
 			test_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_Recover_pd, &sh->ops.state)) {
 			clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE, &sh->state);
@@ -2282,18 +2284,28 @@ #endif
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (expanded && test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state)) {
+	/* Finish 'rcw' operations initiated by the expansion
+	 * process
+	 */
+	if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW, &sh->state) &&
+		test_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW_Expand, &sh->ops.state) &&
+		test_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW_Done, &sh->ops.state)) {
+		clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW, &sh->state);
+		clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW_Done, &sh->ops.state);
+		clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW_Expand, &sh->ops.state);
+		clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state);
+		for (i= conf->raid_disks; i--;)
+			set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
+	}
+
+	if (expanded && test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state) &&
+		!test_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW, &sh->state)) {
 		/* Need to write out all blocks after computing parity */
 		sh->disks = conf->raid_disks;
 		sh->pd_idx = stripe_to_pdidx(sh->sector, conf, conf->raid_disks);
-		compute_parity5(sh, RECONSTRUCT_WRITE);
-		for (i= conf->raid_disks; i--;) {
-			set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
-			locked++;
-			set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
-		}
-		clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state);
-	} else if (expanded) {
+		set_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW_Expand, &sh->ops.state);
+		locked += handle_write_operations5(sh, 0);
+	} else if (expanded && !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_RCW, &sh->state)) {
 		clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state);
 		atomic_dec(&conf->reshape_stripes);
 		wake_up(&conf->wait_for_overlap);
@@ -2327,9 +2339,15 @@ #endif
 					release_stripe(sh2);
 					continue;
 				}
+				/* to do: perform these operations with a dma engine
+				 * inline (rather than pushing to the workqueue)
+				 */
+				/*#ifdef CONFIG_RAID5_DMA*/
+				/*#else*/
 				memcpy(page_address(sh2->dev[dd_idx].page),
 				       page_address(sh->dev[i].page),
 				       STRIPE_SIZE);
+				/*#endif*/
 				set_bit(R5_Expanded, &sh2->dev[dd_idx].flags);
 				set_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh2->dev[dd_idx].flags);
 				for (j=0; j<conf->raid_disks; j++)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ