[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1ac57as5y.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:28:09 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: Make vt_pid a struct pid (making it pid wrap around safe).
Grr. Here is the other half of my confusion.
The patch:
[PATCH] vt: Rework the console spawning variables.
is fine.
The patch:
[PATCH] vt: Make vt_pid a struct pid (making it pid wrap around safe).
which uses xchg() is racy, and needs to be fixed.
Oleg could you confirm that quick analysis.
Thanks,
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists