[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060911073649.GA3188@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:36:49 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@...e.fr>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm1: GPF loop on early boot
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >because userspace does not use it normally, while with %gs we'd switch
> >between glibc's descriptor [which must be shadowed by the CPU] and the
> >kernel's descriptor [which must be shadowed by the CPU too] - hence
> >causing a constant reloading of the shadow register.
> >
>
> Well, that means the only operation which would be different would be
> the pop %fs at the end, since only it would end up loading a null
> selector. All the other operations would presumably take just as
> long.
yes - but loading a null selector is a special-case: you dont have to
invalidate/reload the shadow, you just have to turn access off. This
might or might not make a difference on modern CPUs (it makes a
difference with older CPUs) - but it's worth a try nevertheless. You
measured a 9 cycles degradation with the %gs method, we could recover
some of that.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists