[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acd2a5930609120210w7ee5a156s5fa5bbc59aeabad8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:10:24 +0400
From: "Vitaly Wool" <vitalywool@...il.com>
To: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Mark Gross" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"Preece Scott-PREECE" <scott.preece@...orola.com>,
"pm list" <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
"kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]
Pavel,
On 9/12/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> Can we at least try adding that, before deciding cpufreq is unsuitable
> and starting new interface? I do not think issues are nearly as big as
> you think.. (at user<->kernel interface level, anyway; you'll need big
> changes under the hood).
who talks about user <-> kernel interface level changes at the moment?!
Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists