[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060912092143.GD19482@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:21:43 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@...top.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
ACPI ML <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Adam Belay <abelay@...ell.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>, devel@...top.org
Subject: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
On Wed 2006-09-06 11:19:09, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 12:37 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > 2.4 and 2.6 are *very* different here. You'll probably need to optimize freezer
> > > > in 2.6 a bit...
> > > >
> > >
> > > Among other problems: e.g. 2.4 did not automatically do a VT switch; 2.6
> > > does; we'll have to have a way to signal "we're a sane display driver;
> > > don't switch away from me on suspend".
> >
> > Not like that, please.
> >
> > You are using X running over framebuffer, right? So that kernel is
> > controlling the graphics hardware. In such case it is safe to avoid VT
> > switch.
>
> It should be perfectly safe.
Okay, but per-driver flag is wrong way to go (see the other mail).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists