linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200609121411.36913.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:11:36 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume

On Tuesday 12 September 2006 14:47, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:19:06AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Got it. i8259A_resume calls init_8259A(0) unconditionally, even if
> > > auto_eoi has been set. Keep track of the current status and restore
> > > that on resume. This fixes it for AMD64 and i386.
> >
> > Patch looks okay to me...
>
> Cool. Andi, does it look sane to you? I'm not really sure who to wave
> 8259 code at...

Yes. I already have it queued for .19 at least. Not sure it's critical enough 
for .18, especially since it doesn't seem to be a regression.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/