[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158040605.15465.70.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:56:45 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] MMIO accessors & barriers documentation
> Frame buffers are rarely cachable as such, on x86 they are usually
> write-combining. Which means that the writes can be merged and
> possibly reordered while they are being written but they can't be
> cached. Most arches I believe have something that roughly corresponds
> to write combining.
>
> Ensuring we can still use this optimization to mmio space is
> moderately important.
I've not gone too much in details about write combining (we need to do
something about it but I don't want to mix problems) but I did define
that the ordered accessors aren't guaranteed to provide write combining
on storage mapped with WC enabled while the relaxed or non ordered ones
are. That should be enough at this point.
Later, we should look into providing an ioremap_wc() and possibly page
table flags for write combining userland mappings. Time to get rid of
MTRRs for graphics :) And infiniband-style stuff seems to want that too.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists