[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158152271.9189.129.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:57:50 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
76306.1226@...puserve.com, ak@....de, jeremy@...source.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, zach@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Split i386 and x86_64 ptrace.h
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:52 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> The use of SEGMENT_RPL_MASK in the i386 ptrace.h introduced by
> x86-allow-a-kernel-to-not-be-in-ring-0.patch broke the UML build, as
> UML includes the underlying architecture's ptrace.h, but has no easy
> access to the x86 segment definitions.
>
> Rather than kludging around this, as in the past, this patch splits
> the userspace-usable parts, which are the bits that UML needs, of
> ptrace.h into ptrace-abi.h, which is included back into ptrace.h.
> Thus, there is no net effect on i386.
>
> As a side-effect, this creates a ptrace header which is close to being
> usable in /usr/include.
Yum. But you didn't add that new header to the Kbuild file so it doesn't
get exported. Please do so.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists