[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450845CC.6000402@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:54:20 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dong Feng <middle.fengdong@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
[sorry, I missed some emails when I was out of action a while back. Catching up...]
Andi Kleen wrote:
>>and chuck out the "crappy" rwsem fallback implementation
>
>
> What is crappy with it?
I just mean that it is supposedly the second class implementation. Just
seems wrong when powerpc has implemented the "better" version in a completely
generic way (patch to follow).
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists