[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609131429540.5326@dhcp83-20.boston.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:30:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] AVR32: Make PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC imply PROT_READ
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> The AVR32 MMU has three protection bits for allowing unprivileged
> access, write access and execute access respectively. There is no
> way to deny read access while allowing write or execute access.
>
> make-prot_write-imply-prot_read.patch in mm does basically the same
> thing for several other architectures. One important difference is
> that this patch makes PROT_EXEC imply PROT_READ as well, but it looks
> like this is the case for most other architectures already.
>
makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists