linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/20] iscsi: support for swapping over iSCSI.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45086F16.9030307@cs.wisc.edu>
Date:	Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:50:30 -0500
From:	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] iscsi: support for swapping over iSCSI.

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Implement sht->swapdev() for iSCSI. This method takes care of reserving
> the extra memory needed and marking all relevant sockets with SOCK_VMIO.
> 
> When used for swapping, TCP socket creation is done under GFP_MEMALLOC and
> the TCP connect is done with SOCK_VMIO to ensure their success. Also the
> netlink userspace interface is marked SOCK_VMIO, this will ensure that even
> under pressure we can still communicate with the daemon (which runs as
> mlockall() and needs no additional memory to operate).
> 
> Netlink requests are handled under the new PF_MEM_NOWAIT when a swapper is
> present. This ensures that the netlink socket will not block. User-space will
> need to retry failed requests.
> 
> The TCP receive path is handled under PF_MEMALLOC for SOCK_VMIO sockets.
> This makes sure we do not block the critical socket, and that we do not
> fail to process incomming data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> CC: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c            |  103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c |   23 +++++++-
>  include/scsi/libiscsi.h             |    1 
>  include/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h |    2 
>  4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>  #include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h>
> +#include <scsi/scsi_device.h>
>  
>  #include "iscsi_tcp.h"
>  
> @@ -845,9 +846,13 @@ iscsi_tcp_data_recv(read_descriptor_t *r
>  	int rc;
>  	struct iscsi_conn *conn = rd_desc->arg.data;
>  	struct iscsi_tcp_conn *tcp_conn = conn->dd_data;
> -	int processed;
> +	int processed = 0;
>  	char pad[ISCSI_PAD_LEN];
>  	struct scatterlist sg;
> +	unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
> +
> +	if (sk_has_vmio(tcp_conn->sock->sk))
> +		current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
>  

Is this too late or not needed or what is it for? This function gets run
from the network layer's softirq and at this point we have a skbuff with
data that we want to process. The iscsi layer also does not allocate
memory for read or write IO in this path.

I think we would want to set this flag at a lower level. Something
closer to where the skbuf is allocated?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/