lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:22:25 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael A Fetterman <Michael.Fetterman@...cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Assignment of GDT entries

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I'd not be surprised if movign the TLS segments around would break 
> something. 
>   

I don't think so.  32-bit code running on x86-64 has different TLS 
selectors, and everything seems to work there...

> That said, numbers talk, bullshit walks. If the above just works a lot 
> better for all modern CPU's that all have 64-byte cachelines (because now 
> _everything_ is in that bigger cacheline), and if you can show that with 
> numbers, and nothing breaks in practice, then hey..
>   

My goal would be to do a minimal change which packs all the useful stuff 
together in a 64-byte line.  Ideally it would just use two 32-byte 
lines, but I don't think that's as important.

Caching effects are pretty hard to measure anyway, and with something as 
deeply x86-microarchitectural as this, I could imagine lots of other CPU 
cleverness which could obscure any simple measurement.  But packing 
things into a line certainly can't hurt.

I'll put something together, and see how it goes...

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ