lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060913102237.1e81b419@cad-250-152.norway.atmel.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:22:37 +0200
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	"Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@...il.com>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - avr32

On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:21:17 +0300
"Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@...il.com> wrote:

> On 9/7/06, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 01:18:04 +0300
> > Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@...il.com> wrote:
> >  
> > >
> > > 1. Rename saved_command_line into boot_command_line.
> > > 2. Set command_line as __initdata.  
> >
> > I should probably start using that parse_early_param() stuff,
> > though. I'll update this patch if I do.

The patch "AVR32: Use parse_early_param" does that. Here's an updated
version of your patch that goes on top of that one.

---
 arch/avr32/kernel/setup.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.18-rc5-mm1/arch/avr32/kernel/setup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc5-mm1.orig/arch/avr32/kernel/setup.c	2006-09-07 10:05:07.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc5-mm1/arch/avr32/kernel/setup.c	2006-09-07 10:30:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct avr32_cpuinfo boot_cpu_data = {
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_cpu_data);
 
-static char command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE];
+static char __initdata command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE];
 
 /*
  * Should be more than enough, but if you have a _really_ complex
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ __tagtable(ATAG_MEM, parse_tag_mem);
 
 static int __init parse_tag_cmdline(struct tag *tag)
 {
-	strlcpy(saved_command_line, tag->u.cmdline.cmdline, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
+	strlcpy(boot_command_line, tag->u.cmdline.cmdline, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
 	return 0;
 }
 __tagtable(ATAG_CMDLINE, parse_tag_cmdline);
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ void __init setup_arch (char **cmdline_p
 	init_mm.end_data = (unsigned long) &_edata;
 	init_mm.brk = (unsigned long) &_end;
 
-	strlcpy(command_line, saved_command_line, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
+	strlcpy(command_line, boot_command_line, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
 	*cmdline_p = command_line;
 	parse_early_param();
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ