linux-kernel - Re: [ltp] do I have to worry?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1158137160.5724.123.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:46:00 +0200
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Martin Lorenz <martin@...enz.eu.org>
Cc:	linux-thinkpad@...ux-thinkpad.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [ltp] do I have to worry?

On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 16:41 +0200, Martin Lorenz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:28:44PM +0200, Dipl.-Ing. Martin Lorenz wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I found another error in my dmesg:

Which kernel version ?

> > [50219.992000] e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Down
> > [50225.266000] Trying to free already-free IRQ 201

free_irq() is called either twice or without a previous request_irq()

> > [50225.271000] bridge-eth0: disabling the bridge
> > [50225.274000] bridge-eth0: down
> > [50225.317000] IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 90

request_irq() is called for a shared interrupt, where one of the drivers
does not set the IRQF_SHARED flag.

Can you provide a full bootlog and "lspci -vvv" output please ?

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/