[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060914143048.GB9898@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:30:48 -0500
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Migration of standard timers
Hi Jes,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:11:39AM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> I just took a quick look at your patch, and at least on the surface it
> looks pretty nice to me.
>
> One minor nit, why choose short for the affinity field in struct
> timer_list, it seems a strange size to pick for something which is
> either 0 or 1. Wouldn't int or char be better? I don't know if all
> CPUs have 16 bit stores, but they should have 8 and 32 bit.
Yes, you're probably right. I would have no problem with this being
changed to a 'char'.
>
> The name 'aff' for affinity might not be good either, since we tend to
> refer to affinity as a mask specifying where it's locked to, maybe
> 'locked' would be better?
A field name of 'locked' would be OK with me.
>
> All in the nit-picking department though.
>
> Cheers,
> Jes
>
>
> Index: linux/include/linux/timer.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/timer.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/timer.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ struct timer_list {
> unsigned long data;
>
> struct tvec_t_base_s *base;
> +
> + short aff;
> };
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists