linux-kernel - Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45097767.7010405@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:38:15 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
CC:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Dong Feng <middle.fengdong@...il.com>, ak@...e.de,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?

Ahh, my mistake :)

Nick Piggin wrote:

> It is actually larger here.
> 
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>     970       0       0     970     3ca lib/rwsem-spinlock.o
>     576       0       0     576     240 kernel/spinlock.o
                                            ^^ should be:
        35       0       0      35      23 kernel/rwsem.o

>   =1546
> 
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>    1310       0       0    1310     51e lib/rwsem.o
>     193       0       0     193      c1 kernel/rwsem.o
>   =1503

Well, it is still larger than the atomic_inc_return variant
after my patch.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/