[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4509C2DF.8000007@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:00:15 -0500
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] iscsi: support for swapping over iSCSI.
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 14:22 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 15:50 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>>>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>> Implement sht->swapdev() for iSCSI. This method takes care of reserving
>>>>> the extra memory needed and marking all relevant sockets with SOCK_VMIO.
>>>>>
>>>>> When used for swapping, TCP socket creation is done under GFP_MEMALLOC and
>>>>> the TCP connect is done with SOCK_VMIO to ensure their success. Also the
>>>>> netlink userspace interface is marked SOCK_VMIO, this will ensure that even
>>>>> under pressure we can still communicate with the daemon (which runs as
>>>>> mlockall() and needs no additional memory to operate).
>>>>>
>>>>> Netlink requests are handled under the new PF_MEM_NOWAIT when a swapper is
>>>>> present. This ensures that the netlink socket will not block. User-space will
>>>>> need to retry failed requests.
>>>>>
>>>>> The TCP receive path is handled under PF_MEMALLOC for SOCK_VMIO sockets.
>>>>> This makes sure we do not block the critical socket, and that we do not
>>>>> fail to process incomming data.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>>>>> CC: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c | 23 +++++++-
>>>>> include/scsi/libiscsi.h | 1
>>>>> include/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h | 2
>>>>> 4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>>>>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>>>>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>>>>> #include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
>>>>> #include <scsi/scsi.h>
>>>>> #include <scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h>
>>>>> +#include <scsi/scsi_device.h>
>>>>>
>>>>> #include "iscsi_tcp.h"
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -845,9 +846,13 @@ iscsi_tcp_data_recv(read_descriptor_t *r
>>>>> int rc;
>>>>> struct iscsi_conn *conn = rd_desc->arg.data;
>>>>> struct iscsi_tcp_conn *tcp_conn = conn->dd_data;
>>>>> - int processed;
>>>>> + int processed = 0;
>>>>> char pad[ISCSI_PAD_LEN];
>>>>> struct scatterlist sg;
>>>>> + unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (sk_has_vmio(tcp_conn->sock->sk))
>>>>> + current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
>>>>>
>>>> Is this too late or not needed or what is it for? This function gets run
>>>> from the network layer's softirq and at this point we have a skbuff with
>>>> data that we want to process. The iscsi layer also does not allocate
>>>> memory for read or write IO in this path.
>>> I thought I found allocations in that path, lemme search...
>>> found this:
>>>
>>> iscsi_tcp_data_recv()
>>> iscsi_data_rescv()
>>> iscsi_complete_pdu()
>>> __iscsi_complete_pdu()
>>> iscsi_recv_pdu()
>>> alloc_skb( GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>
>> You are right that is for the netlink interface. Could we move the
>> PF_MEMALLOC setting and clearing to iscsi_recv_pdu and and add it to
>> iscsi_conn_error in scsi_transport_iscsi.c so that iscsi_iser and
>> qla4xxx will have it set when they need it. I will send a patch for this
>> along with a way to have the netlink sock vmio set for all iscsi drivers
>> that need it.
>
> I already have such a patch, look at:
> http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/vm_deadlock/current/iscsi_vmio.patch
>
You are drowning me in patches :) I did not see that one. I was still
commenting on this patch :)
The new patch looks ok.
> but what conditional do you want to use for PF_MEMALLOC, an
> unconditional setting will be highly unpopular.
>
> Hmm, perhaps you could key it of sk_has_vmio(nls)...
Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists