linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/25] dm snapshot: make read and write exception functions void

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060914213930.GM3928@agk.surrey.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:39:30 +0100
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/25] dm snapshot: make read and write exception functions void

From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>

read_exception() and write_exception() only return an error if
supplied with an out-of-range index.  If this ever happens it's the
result of a bug in the calling code so we handle this with an
assertion and remove the error handling in the callers.

Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>

Index: linux-2.6.18-rc7/drivers/md/dm-exception-store.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc7.orig/drivers/md/dm-exception-store.c	2006-09-14 20:38:48.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc7/drivers/md/dm-exception-store.c	2006-09-14 20:39:03.000000000 +0100
@@ -296,42 +296,29 @@ static int write_header(struct pstore *p
  */
 static struct disk_exception *get_exception(struct pstore *ps, uint32_t index)
 {
-	if (index >= ps->exceptions_per_area)
-		return NULL;
+	BUG_ON(index >= ps->exceptions_per_area);
 
 	return ((struct disk_exception *) ps->area) + index;
 }
 
-static int read_exception(struct pstore *ps,
-			  uint32_t index, struct disk_exception *result)
+static void read_exception(struct pstore *ps,
+			   uint32_t index, struct disk_exception *result)
 {
-	struct disk_exception *e;
-
-	e = get_exception(ps, index);
-	if (!e)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	struct disk_exception *e = get_exception(ps, index);
 
 	/* copy it */
 	result->old_chunk = le64_to_cpu(e->old_chunk);
 	result->new_chunk = le64_to_cpu(e->new_chunk);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
-static int write_exception(struct pstore *ps,
-			   uint32_t index, struct disk_exception *de)
+static void write_exception(struct pstore *ps,
+			    uint32_t index, struct disk_exception *de)
 {
-	struct disk_exception *e;
-
-	e = get_exception(ps, index);
-	if (!e)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	struct disk_exception *e = get_exception(ps, index);
 
 	/* copy it */
 	e->old_chunk = cpu_to_le64(de->old_chunk);
 	e->new_chunk = cpu_to_le64(de->new_chunk);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -349,10 +336,7 @@ static int insert_exceptions(struct psto
 	*full = 1;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ps->exceptions_per_area; i++) {
-		r = read_exception(ps, i, &de);
-
-		if (r)
-			return r;
+		read_exception(ps, i, &de);
 
 		/*
 		 * If the new_chunk is pointing at the start of
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/