linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] Integrity Service and SLIM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060914165113.3067c4b0.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:51:13 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LSM ML <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Safford <safford@...ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>, Serge Hallyn <sergeh@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Integrity Service and SLIM

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:57:25 -0700
Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@...ibm.com> wrote:

> This is an updated request for comments on a proposed integrity 
> service framework and dummy provider, along with SLIM, a low 
> water-mark mandatory access control LSM module which utilizes the 
> integrity services as additional input to the access control decisions.

Having carefully reviewed your code I have come to the firm conclusion that
it is written in C.  The next step is to put it all in -mm and see if
anyone shouts at me.

I'll need help on the upstream-merge decision.

A convincing statement of interest (or, better, intent) from vendors (ie:
the people who will deliver and support this into the target users) would
help a lot.  Where do we stand with that?

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/