[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158323938.29932.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:38:58 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Ar Gwe, 2006-09-15 am 13:46 +0200, ysgrifennodd Roman Zippel:
> > That misses the entire point. If you have dynamic tracepoints you don't
> > have any static tracepoints to maintain because you don't need them.
>
> This assumes dynamic tracepoints are generally available, which is wrong.
Wrong in what sense, you don't have them implemented or your
architecture is mindbogglingly braindead you can't implement them ?
> This assumes that dynamic tracepoints can't benefit from static source
> annotations, which is also wrong.
gcc -g produces extensive annotations which are then usably by many
tools other than gdb.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists