[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450ABA2A.9060406@opersys.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:35:22 -0400
From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Alan Cox wrote:
> In the meantime perhaps the saner members of the static trace brigade
> can explain why gcc debug data isn't good enough for them when its good
> enough for kgdb to do single stepping at source level and variable
> printing ?
Care to explain how I can use to implement the equivalent of this:
@@ -1709,6 +1712,7 @@ switch_tasks:
++*switch_count;
prepare_arch_switch(rq, next);
+ TRACE_SCHEDCHANGE(prev, next);
prev = context_switch(rq, prev, next);
barrier();
Also, care to explain how kprobes can be used to access same data
without having to actually customize a probe point for every binary?
Thanks,
Karim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists