[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060915092600.3046c511.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:26:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: torvalds@...l.org, gregkh@...e.de, bunk@...sta.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Race condition in usermodehelper.
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:46:54 +0200
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>
> [patch] Race condition in usermodehelper.
>
> There is a race between call_usermodehelper_keys, __call_usermodehelper
> and wait_for_helper. It should only happen if preemption is enabled or
> on a virtualized system.
>
> If the cpu is preempted or put to sleep by the hypervisor in
> __call_usermodehelper between the creation of the wait_for_helper
> thread and the second check on sub_info->wait, the whole execution
> of wait_for_helper including the complete call and the continuation
> after the wait_for_completion in call_usermodehelper_keys can have
> happened before __call_usermodehelper checks sub_info->wait for the
> second time. Since sub_info can already have been clobbered,
> sub_info->wait could be zero and complete is called a second time
> with an invalid argument. This has happened on s390. It took me only
> three days to find out ..
You mean three days work?
If so, I owe you a big apology, because an identical patch has been in -mm
for over a month. I guess I didn't appreciate its significance.
Shall expedite.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists